Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam...
From: Jesse W (jessw_at_netwood.net)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 21:04:05 PDT
- Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: Summary of Round 206 in progress"
- In reply to: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Reply: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
On 9 Apr 2003,, Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt_at_gulbrandsen.priv.no> wrote:
> Some spammers are already
> using scraped address pairs,
I'm ignorent. What's that?
> a) I move you to a different address, using the same software except
> with even stricter settings
I vote for this. I don't _think_ it would cause too many problems...
> b) I help move you over to nomic.net
It's nice of them to offer, but Arnt and trolltech seem to be doing fine(except
for the spam. ;-) )
> c) keep the status quo
There is a _lot_ of spam comming in recently.
So I vote for "a".
Jesse W
----
http://netwood.net/usr/jessw
--
Rule Date: 2003-04-11 04:05:54 GMT
- Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Previous message: Ed Murphy: "Re: Summary of Round 206 in progress"
- In reply to: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Reply: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST