Re: Summary of Round 206 in progress

From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Thu Apr 10 2003 - 10:10:21 PDT

Next message: Jesse W: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
Previous message: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 206 final summary"
Maybe in reply to: Ed Murphy: "Summary of Round 206 in progress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Andre wrote:

>As has been mine, since I did not post any rule this round. 206:3 has been
>doctored to look like it came from me, but it did not.

I don't see any evidence of doctoring here:

http://www.sir-toby.com/archives/FRC/2003-April/1259.html

but this doesn't contain full headers.  Would someone please bounce me a
copy of this individual message?

In any case, Nathan is still Judge, and Steve is still Wizard (unless 206:3
was really written by Nathan, in which case e and Steve tie for Wizard).

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-04-11 02:44:05 GMT

Next message: Jesse W: "Re: Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, spam..."
Previous message: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 206 final summary"
Maybe in reply to: Ed Murphy: "Summary of Round 206 in progress"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST