From: Jesse W (jessw_at_netwood.net)
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 21:37:46 PDT
Ed Murphy wrote: > From: Sir Topham Hatt > To: Fantasy Rail Committee > > Dear Sirs, > > Our customers lack a proper map, which causes confusion and delay. From > now on, each rule shall mention a new tunnel, and a new station that joins > that tunnel to a previously mentioned tunnel. > > Now, if you will please turn your attention to Mr. Conductor, who will > begin explaining the schedule in the next rule. <sig removed> > Rule Date: 2002-10-04 01:56:46 GMT Validity: VALID, because it's restriction does not include it. Style: It fixes a sort-of hole in the previous rule; that is, it requires tunnel and station building instead of merely defining how to do such; however it does not follow it's own restriction, which is not stylish. Good, solid, even with the "from now on" bit, I'll give it a 2. So, 2 Style points for 194:2 Your Judge, Jesse Weinstein -- Rule Date: 2002-10-05 04:43:32 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST