From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 04:09:05 PDT
Joshua wrote: > > VALID +0.5 > > At first I thought this was invalid until I realized that 186:1 does > not specify that ALL future rules will reveal a Calvinball restriction > but only the "next" one. I don't see James Willson actively handling the ball, or any more devious way he might be satisfying 186:2's requirement that, "As usual, every rule must include such a play." -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2002-06-21 11:09:24 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST