Re: 186:4 VALID + 0.5

From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 04:09:05 PDT


Joshua wrote:
>
> VALID +0.5
>
> At first I thought this was invalid until I realized that 186:1 does
> not specify that ALL future rules will reveal a Calvinball restriction
> but only the "next" one.

I don't see James Willson actively handling the ball, or any more
devious way he might be satisfying 186:2's requirement that, "As
usual, every rule must include such a play."

-Jesse

--
Rule Date: 2002-06-21 11:09:24 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST