From: Joshua (j3b4_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Jun 21 2002 - 03:17:54 PDT
--- James Willson <jkvw3_at_yahoo.com> wrote: > 186:4 > >>>>>>>>>> > > "In a last ditch effort, Ed Murphy grabs the ball and passes, > but it finishes melting before it can be received! > The game is over!" > > "With a score of 6-3, all penalty points, Team Aqua takes the win." > > "That's right; it seems Aqua's strategy of never attempting > a goal shot worked out for them." > > "And without the three points Ed Murphy earned for Aqua fouling his > goal shots, > we'd have a tie now." > > "Having given away five of the opposition's six points, > he's surely going to be named Least Valuable Player." > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup > http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-06-20 02:52:09 GMT VALID +0.5 At first I thought this was invalid until I realized that 186:1 does not specify that ALL future rules will reveal a Calvinball restriction but only the "next" one. Style wise this rule is short, that's good. I like the writing and comentary but I am getting impatient with rules that don't aggressively limit the freedoms of future rule writers. This rule does little to the round except attempt to remove the catalyst which I was liking so much. Until the round itself is over I will not make a final decision about who the "winning" team is and what bonus it's members will recieve. Few committee members have even been assigned to teams at this point. ______________________________________________________________________ Post your ad for free now! http://personals.yahoo.ca -- Rule Date: 2002-06-21 10:18:03 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST