From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:57:41 PDT
rsholmes_at_rodan.syr.edu (Richard S. Holmes) writes: > Anton Cox <A.G.Cox_at_city.ac.uk> writes: > > > "hopefully you will all have copies of the board and so you will > > know what is going on." > > > > I dont think that the "hopefully" modified can be reasonably attached > > to anything other than the state of ownership of a copy (ie the quote > > is of the form "(hopefully X) and so Y"). I do have a copy of the > > board, and thus by the rest of the quote "I will know what is going > > on." > > Two points: > > (1) I disagree; I think it can be equally reasonably interpreted as > "hopefully (X and so Y)". Actually let me make a more forceful claim: that "(hopefully X) and so Y" is *not* a reasonable interpretation. The phrase "and so" tells us that Y is a (definite) consequence of something, namely, the thing before "and so". But how can an indefinite wish ("hopefully X") have a definite consequence? In order to "know what's going on" with certainty I *must* "have a copy of the board" -- Alan's wishing that I might have one isn't sufficient. I claim "hopefully (X and so Y)" in fact is not only a reasonable interpretation, but (of the two interpretations given) is the *only* reasonable interpretation. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:57:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST