From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:47:14 PDT
Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> writes: > Gallivanting Tripper wrote: > > > I vote against 165:A, because what went on 4 rounds ago is nobody's > > business. > > Crumb. Last time I made that mistake it led to a War. I withraw my proposal > and substitute an one for which 165 is replaced with 169 everywhere that it > appears. And a vote FOR the proposal. And I shoot myself in the head. I still vote AGAINST, because the rule numbers are wrong. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:47:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST