From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 09:03:21 PDT
Anton Cox wrote: > > I didnt say that we knew *how* things work, just *what* was going > on. For example the wind was an action, the reason for which we did > not know. But when it happened we knew about it! There was no action > prior to 169:2 caused by the Safe House, indeed I dont believe there > have been any actions that have been introduced as occuring > retrospectively... I would say that your 169:6 retroactively made me guilty of unoriginality (from 169:3). > But this was meant to be an ultra-pedantic point; my principle > argument concerned the lack of a counter on my copy. Yes, I am in agreement with you on this point, just not the other more pedantic one. -Jesse -- Rule Date: 2001-10-03 16:03:40 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST