Proposals 165:A, 169:A, and 169:B

From: Glenn Overby II (
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 08:57:38 PDT

I am not certain of the status of Proposal 165:A (Aron) under the Regular
Ordinances.  But I think it will be moot if it does happen to pass.  I vote AGAINST.

I vote AGAINST Proposal 169:A (Tripper) for the reasons specified by the Judge
in his initial ruling and follow-up responses to the list.

I vote AGAINST Proposal 169:B (Aron) as I don't think the Committee should be
judging rules that have not yet been proposed.


Rule Date: 2001-10-03 15:59:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST