Re: 169:B

From: Anton Cox (A.G.Cox_at_city.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 03 2001 - 07:52:11 PDT


On Wed, 3 Oct 2001, Aron Wall wrote:

> Crumb.  Last time I made that mistake it led to a War.  I withraw my proposal
> and substitute an one for which 165 is replaced with 169 everywhere that it
> appears.  And a vote FOR the proposal.  And I shoot myself in the head.

Why are you doing this since

a) There is already a replacement for your proposal on the table, and
b) Your revised version still refers to rules that do not exist!

Someone remove that gun from Aron before he injures himself further...

Best Wishes,

     Anton

--
Rule Date: 2001-10-03 14:51:30 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST