224:2

From: Joshua (joshua_at_bearsend.ca)
Date: Mon May 17 2004 - 19:35:42 PDT

Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Previous message: David Nicol: "Re: 224:1 -- the committee to combat apathy"
In reply to: David Nicol: "Re: 224:1 -- the committee to combat apathy"
Next in thread: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Reply: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Reply: jcm3_at_cec.wustl.edu: "224:2 VALID +2, no effect!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I second rule 224:1.

However I don't recall reading it.  All future rules must claim that
their authors are ignorant of previous rules.  (Ignorance of course is
no excuse for non-compliance.)

Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Previous message: David Nicol: "Re: 224:1 -- the committee to combat apathy"
In reply to: David Nicol: "Re: 224:1 -- the committee to combat apathy"
Next in thread: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Reply: David Nicol: "Re: 224:2 question"
Reply: jcm3_at_cec.wustl.edu: "224:2 VALID +2, no effect!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST