RSH identity

From: david (
Date: Fri Feb 06 2004 - 13:02:37 PST

on the other hand, I am fairly certain that those postings
would be fall within definitions of "identical" applicable
to copyright law.

I don't think "later drafts of the same work" are widely
considered to be "non-identical derivative works" although
that is what they become when one uses RSH's "identical"

Do we have any IP lawyers on the list any more?

> Richard S. Holmes wrote:
>>To call two postings
>>identical when one has been edited for grammar, word choice, and
>>punctuation over-strains the word "identical".

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST