Re: anecdote 221:e (1 of 2) INVALID, +1.0

From: david (whatever_at_davidnicol.com)
Date: Fri Feb 06 2004 - 10:52:02 PST

• Next message: david: "RSH identity"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:e (1 of 2) INVALID, +1.0"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:e (1 of 2) INVALID, +1.0"
• Next in thread: david: "RSH identity"
• Reply: david: "RSH identity"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ming bai!  Ming bai le!

(to translate from the Chinese: "thank you, I understand now")
(yes I know I mistransliterated, in case you know Chinese)




Richard S. Holmes wrote:
> To call two postings
> identical when one has been edited for grammar, word choice, and
> punctuation over-strains the word "identical".

• Next message: david: "RSH identity"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:e (1 of 2) INVALID, +1.0"
• In reply to: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:e (1 of 2) INVALID, +1.0"
• Next in thread: david: "RSH identity"
• Reply: david: "RSH identity"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST