From: jcm3_at_cec.wustl.edu
Date: Tue Feb 03 2004 - 10:17:02 PST
Um - I don't think Joshua expected to be docked 1.5 style pointes just for reposting the same rule. Its not clear, but he might not have intended to post that rule twice. The anecdote of Joshua's is a sad one. But hopefully this rule will fare better, because I understand that for this rule to have an effect on the game it must be totally unambiguous: Future rules must point out an unexpected consequence involving at least one previous rule. I think the unexpected consequences of Joshua's double posting demonstrates a real moral for FRC: Inspired but literal judging can result in new interesting rules. Jae
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST