Re: frc: proposal

From: Richard Gresty (wolfchar_at_sdf.lonestar.org)
Date: Sun Dec 19 2004 - 03:40:30 PST

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: frc: proposal"
• In reply to: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, Bor Onx wrote:

> I'd like to announce my intention to join the FRC with
> a proposal to replace RO 6 (but not 6a and 6b) with
> the following for the length of this round:
>
> 6.  Judge.  The Judge is responsible for interpreting
> the ordinances and determining the validity of fantasy
> rules. If a fantasy rule is consistent with itself,
> previously posted valid fantasy rules, or the regular
> ordinances, then the Judge shall declare that rule
> invalid or unsuccesful, otherwise e shall declare it valid.

I vote AGAINST.

-- 
-- Richard Gresty, <wolfchar_at_sdf.lonestar.org>
MetaARPA Member, SDF Public Access UNIX System (http://sdf.lonestar.org)

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Previous message: Stephen Turner: "Re: frc: proposal"
• In reply to: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST