From: Rich Holmes (rsholmes_at_mailbox.syr.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 16 2004 - 10:48:23 PST
Aron Wall <aron_at_wall.org> writes: > > Nor can one argue that the restriction is purely descriptive, rather > > than restrictive, because the restriction was not in fact followed in > > that past round. Nonsense. A description does not have to be accurate to be a description. If I say 'Aron Wall is a three-legged lemur who owns 52% of Microsoft', am I asserting that I require you to be so? Or merely describing you in what I would assume is an inaccurate fashion? And since it is the rules of a different round, not the rules of this round nor the ROs, that are being inaccurately described, there is no validity-affecting inconsistency. - Rich Holmes
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST