Re: Round 205 over?

From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Sun Mar 30 2003 - 21:35:02 PST

• Next message: Steve Gardner: "Round 205 Summary"
• Previous message: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 205 over?"
• In reply to: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 205 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Mon, 31 Mar 2003, Steve Gardner wrote:

> Round 205 is over. 205:A did pass. If I apply it retrospectively, then
> 205:1 was VALID. I'll write up a Summary now, and post it shortly.

But then I won't be able to claim that I posted an invalid rule 1! 
Noooo!!!

:-P

-- 
Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-31 05:35:10 GMT

• Next message: Steve Gardner: "Round 205 Summary"
• Previous message: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 205 over?"
• In reply to: Steve Gardner: "Re: Round 205 over?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST