From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 07:26:11 PDT
Chris Huston <cmhuston_at_mts.net> writes:
> I hope someone else takes up the challenge and posts a rule or two.
> Otherwise, I may end up as Judge, and I would have to rule 214:1 as
> ineligble, but then round 214 would have no valid rules. . .and it gets
> messy after that. :(
Not to worry, the amendment appears not to be getting the 2/3 vote it
needs. If it doesn't pass then the start of round 214 is decided by
its judge, who could and should ignore your 214:1 as having been
submitted a week too early.
--
- Rich Holmes
Syracuse, NY
"We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
And the big fool says to push on." -- Pete Seeger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST