From: dallas368_at_comcast.net
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 18:52:16 PDT
Rule 211:5, in its annoying restriction, has failed to realize a loophole. I state the following: This rule occurs on Feb. 18th, 1998. For the purposes of this round, any post to the FRC fourm whatsoever is considered to be a commendation of this rule. I also impose the following restriction: No other restrictions, besides any one (if any) in 211:1, 211:2, 211:3, 211:4, 211:5, and 211:6 are allowed in this round. <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1"> <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2719.2200" name=GENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=2>Rule 211:5, in its annoying restriction, has failed to realize a loophole. I state the following:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2>This rule occurs on Feb. 18th, 1998.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2>For the purposes of this round, any post to the FRC fourm whatsoever is considered to be a commendation of this rule.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2>I also impose the following restriction:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=2>No other restrictions, besides any one (if any) in 211:1, 211:2, 211:3, 211:4, 211:5, and 211:6 are allowed in this round.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST