From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Nov 26 2002 - 15:38:49 PST
On Tue, 26 Nov 2002, Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) wrote: > Hmm... Well, we could probably spend the remainder of this round > discussing the intricacies of this rule. Is there a restriction in it that > I'm not seeing? The restriction is in the last sentence: you are supposed to anagrammatize more extravagantly than I do. Of course, exactly what that means is left deliberately vague to give the Judge something interesting to think about. But there are four anagrams of 'Fantasy Rules Committee' in my Rule... > I haven't decided yet... And how about that Chinese puzzle > box? Is it an unopened box that needs opening (197:03)? If it is, that's > quite a lengthy description to surpass (196:04). It certainly is an unopened box that needs opening. -- Steve Gardner | Each writer creates their own School of Computer Science | precursors. and Software Engineering | gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au | -- Jorge Luis Borges -- Rule Date: 2002-11-26 23:41:21 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST