Re: 197:2 VALID 0.0

From: Nathan Russell (nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu)
Date: Mon Nov 25 2002 - 10:17:21 PST


On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 16:33:58 +0900, j3b4_at_yahoo.com wrote:

>I give the FRC a future.  Or a future(s) contract to be exact, 
>allowing rules to be purchased at today's affordable price of 99 
>Fantasy Bucks (Fantasy Bucks are pegged to the Euro at 13.23 
>Euro's = 1 FB).  Since the value of rules is a function of their 
>scarcity this will afford the committee hedge against leaner 
>times (such as the holiday's) when rules are hard to come by.
>Perhaps it's not the warmest or most romantic gift the 
>committee could receive but I trust it's value will be 
>appreciated.  In order that we can fairly and objectively 
>compare their value, all rules following this one must specify 
>the cash price of their author's gifts to the committee.-- 
>Joshua E. Bearden
>"Beware the fury of the patient man. "
>-Dryden, (1631-1700)

Seems unkind to require all gifts to have a price...  but OTOH the
contest doesn't specify that gifts be "romantic" and neither does FR
1.  As such, VALID 0 for the length and persuasive argument, canceled
by a penalty for the 'uncaring' nature.  

Nathan

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-25 18:17:04 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST