From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:21:19 PST
on 11/19/02 8:20 PM, Steve Gardner at gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au wrote: > On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote: > >> on 11/15/02 11:07 AM, Jonathan David Amery at jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org wrote: >> >>> '85 was the best round. Stopping FRC >>> getting murdered is something we >>> appreciated. All rules must give a >>> measure that will help defend the FRC. >>> Alas the FRC dies...' -- The Tablets. >> >> Short. Lines short and number words is less. >> Eulogy good. Save FRC. Remember past. >> Tablets. No Fantasy. 3 days old=VALID. >> Judge happy. Style +3 > > What about the restriction in 196:9 - that each eulogy recall the deeds > of some past FRC player, now departed? > > BTW, now that 196:9 has been declared VALID, how long do I have to post > a new Rule? The rule became valid by default, so the requirement for a past player does not apply. I have posted Summary 2 which gives the new eligible dates. >From the FRC rules: 8. Restrictions on Judge's Power. The decision of the Judge may be changed if a proposal is made to do so and that proposal receives a two-thirds affirmative vote of the members voting on that proposal within three (3) days after the posting of that proposal. Default. If the Judge does not declare judgment of a fantasy rule within three (3) days after its posting, e shall be considered then to have decided and declared that rule valid. Tieka, waiting for the next wave -- Rule Date: 2002-11-20 02:23:19 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST