Re: 196:10 (should be 196:11) VALID +3.0

From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:21:19 PST


on 11/19/02 8:20 PM, Steve Gardner at gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au wrote:

> On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote:
> 
>> on 11/15/02 11:07 AM, Jonathan David Amery at jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org wrote:
>> 
>>> '85 was the best round. Stopping FRC
>>> getting murdered is something we
>>> appreciated. All rules must give a
>>> measure that will help defend the FRC.
>>> Alas the FRC dies...' -- The Tablets.
>> 
>> Short. Lines short and number words is less.
>> Eulogy good. Save FRC. Remember past.
>> Tablets. No Fantasy. 3 days old=VALID.
>> Judge happy. Style +3
> 
> What about the restriction in 196:9 - that each eulogy recall the deeds
> of some past FRC player, now departed?
> 
> BTW, now that 196:9 has been declared VALID, how long do I have to post
> a new Rule?

The rule became valid by default, so the requirement for a past player does
not apply. I have posted Summary 2 which gives the new eligible dates.

>From the FRC rules:

8.  Restrictions on Judge's Power. The decision of the Judge may be
    changed if a proposal is made to do so and that proposal
    receives a two-thirds affirmative vote of the members voting on
    that proposal within three (3) days after the posting of that
    proposal.

    Default. If the Judge does not declare judgment of a fantasy
    rule within three (3) days after its posting, e shall be
    considered then to have decided and declared that rule valid.

Tieka,
waiting for the next wave

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-20 02:23:19 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST