From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:20:11 PST
On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote: > on 11/15/02 11:07 AM, Jonathan David Amery at jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org wrote: > > > '85 was the best round. Stopping FRC > > getting murdered is something we > > appreciated. All rules must give a > > measure that will help defend the FRC. > > Alas the FRC dies...' -- The Tablets. > > Short. Lines short and number words is less. > Eulogy good. Save FRC. Remember past. > Tablets. No Fantasy. 3 days old=VALID. > Judge happy. Style +3 What about the restriction in 196:9 - that each eulogy recall the deeds of some past FRC player, now departed? BTW, now that 196:9 has been declared VALID, how long do I have to post a new Rule? -- Steve Gardner | Each writer creates their own School of Computer Science | precursors. and Software Engineering | gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au | -- Jorge Luis Borges -- Rule Date: 2002-11-20 01:21:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST