Re: 196:10 (should be 196:11) VALID +3.0

From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Nov 19 2002 - 17:20:11 PST


On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Tieka wrote:

> on 11/15/02 11:07 AM, Jonathan David Amery at jdamery_at_ysolde.ucam.org wrote:
> 
> > '85 was the best round. Stopping FRC
> > getting murdered is something we
> > appreciated. All rules must give a
> > measure that will help defend the FRC.
> > Alas the FRC dies...' -- The Tablets.
> 
> Short. Lines short and number words is less.
> Eulogy good. Save FRC. Remember past.
> Tablets. No Fantasy. 3 days old=VALID.
> Judge happy. Style +3

What about the restriction in 196:9 - that each eulogy recall the deeds
of some past FRC player, now departed?

BTW, now that 196:9 has been declared VALID, how long do I have to post
a new Rule?

-- 


Steve Gardner                     |  Each writer creates their own
School of Computer Science        |  precursors.
 and Software Engineering         |  
gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au     |           -- Jorge Luis Borges

-- 
Rule Date: 2002-11-20 01:21:30 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST