Re: 196:9 INVALID +3.0

From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 10:29:02 PST


on 11/13/02 8:04 PM, Steve Gardner at gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au wrote:

> FRC! How I frolicked among the limericks of Round 2 with Joev, who
> circumvented the traps I set for him! As the ancient Fr'cyeh Tablets
> provide, let each of us step forward and recall the deeds of a former
> FRC player, now departed. Perhaps thus we may find courage to save FRC.
>
> --
>
>
> Steve Gardner                     |  Each writer creates their own
> School of Computer Science        |  precursors.
> and Software Engineering         |
> gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au     |           -- Jorge Luis Borges
>
> --
> Rule Date: 2002-11-14 01:05:59 GMT


Follows theme nicely, and most other rules, but I cannot determine how we
are supposed to save FRC (re 196:1). This rule is even shorter in at least
one respect than all other valid rules, and some of the invalid ones as
well. It is nice to see a new/old face. so, I will give the traditional high
style for newcomers. INVALID +3.0

Tieka,
who can see the end of the tunnel

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-14 19:31:20 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST