Re: A Judges Commentary for 196

From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Tue Nov 12 2002 - 20:06:30 PST

• Next message: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "196:8"
• Previous message: Nathan Russell: "Too late to join?"
• In reply to: Tieka: "A Judges Commentary for 196"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: A Judges Commentary for 196"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Tieka wrote:

> I belief that by specifying a theme, it becomes part of the
> ordinaces

There is no justification for this in the R.O.'s, which clearly define what
ordinances are.  The proper method to punish deviations from the theme is
through style deductions.

Aron Wall

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-13 04:07:01 GMT

• Next message: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby): "196:8"
• Previous message: Nathan Russell: "Too late to join?"
• In reply to: Tieka: "A Judges Commentary for 196"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: A Judges Commentary for 196"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST