From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Thu May 30 2002 - 12:00:57 PDT
Perhaps my ruling was not sufficiently clear. The inconsistency is not between 185:5 and some future rule; the inconsistency is between 185:5 and the ROs, because 185:5 in combination with the ROs requires that future rules, in order to be declared VALID, must be declared INVALID. -- - Rich Holmes Syracuse, NY -- Rule Date: 2002-05-30 19:01:29 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST