From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 11:53:49 PST
Mark Nau wrote: > Every Rule shall include one new fyaphic[ficticious] word, along with a proposed > meaning for that word in brackets. Future Rules may re-interpret fyaphic words > so long as the re-interpretation is consistent with all prior Valid Rules. > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-03-28 02:21:22 GMT VALID. So does the proposed meaning have any effect on the round at all? I shall assume for now that until a fyaphic word is explicitly re-interpreted by a future rule, it will be considered to have the initially proposed meaning, for otherwise any restriction including a fyaphic word would have no effect, as any rule that contradicted it would simply passively redefine the restriction to something that allowed it to be VALID. +1 for setting the round solidly on theme. The Judge -- Rule Date: 2002-03-28 19:53:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST