180:3

From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Thu Mar 28 2002 - 00:05:05 PST

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:1 VALID +1"
• Previous message: Alan Riddell: "180:2"
• Next in thread: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:3 VALID -1"
• Reply: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:3 VALID -1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Having encountered fyaphic words and splitsplotsplinksplonks, it is only
natural that we should next run across [words containing the letter "z"]
zwammerbunds, whose proposed descriptions [the bracketed ones] shall always
precede them.

The next rule shall re-interpret at least one fyaphic word.


--
Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com>          "I'm not sure I can go through
http://members.fortunecity.com/emurphy/      with it.  Leave, I mean."

--
Rule Date: 2002-03-28 08:05:31 GMT

• Next message: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:1 VALID +1"
• Previous message: Alan Riddell: "180:2"
• Next in thread: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:3 VALID -1"
• Reply: Aron Wall: "Judgement 180:3 VALID -1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST