From: Aron Wall (aron_at_wall.org)
Date: Mon Apr 01 2002 - 19:46:47 PST
Karl Low wrote: > Having taken a much deeper look at my rule, I suddenly realized what was > wrong.. I specified "fyaphics" when what I meant to specify was "rules > containing fyaphics". This kind of mistake (especially for an FRC member, > where we're supposedly paying attention to the syntax) is.. well.. horrible. > > To that end, I hereby propose that 180:4b be declared INVALID, regardless of > the Timeout rule. > > That was just ugly and it'll make the round a serious pain otherwise. > > Karl > > _________________________________________________________________ > Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > -- > Rule Date: 2002-04-02 03:27:23 GMT I vote FOR. For Karl's prompt response to my plea, and in accordance with my suggestion in my judgement of his rule, he shall only recieve -2 style points for his rule, on the condition that he vote for his own proposal. And after all, this wouldn't have been such a mess if I had judged it earlier. I shall treat the rule as INVALID on the presumption that this proposal will pass unless it doesn't look like it will pass. The Judge -- Rule Date: 2002-04-02 03:46:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST