From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Tue Apr 02 2002 - 06:09:47 PST
on 4/1/02 9:27 PM, Karl Low at gurugreat_at_hotmail.com wrote: > Having taken a much deeper look at my rule, I suddenly realized what was > wrong.. I specified "fyaphics" when what I meant to specify was "rules > containing fyaphics". This kind of mistake (especially for an FRC member, > where we're supposedly paying attention to the syntax) is.. well.. horrible. > > To that end, I hereby propose that 180:4b be declared INVALID, regardless of > the Timeout rule. Unfortunetly, I am forced to agree with the interpetation of the Judge and with Karl. I vote FOR this proposal. I must note that playing this game is a lot harder than watching. I shall endeavor to be more precise in my rules and to look a good deal harder at _all_ submitted rules. With any luck at all, I will be able to further confuse the judge with another rule. Tieka --"I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." Bilbo Baggins -- Rule Date: 2002-04-02 14:10:58 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST