Re: 167:17, VALID, +2.0

From: Jesse Welton (jwelton_at_pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu)
Date: Thu Aug 23 2001 - 10:36:18 PDT


Christopher Bartlett wrote:
>
> Do I incorrectly read one of the strictures of 167:12 to limit rules to 25
> words or less?  If not, then 167:17 must be ruled invalid.

It is not the word count that must be 25 or less, but the length of a
rule's genetic sequence, which only counts words beginning with 'a',
'g', 'c', or 't'.

-Jesse

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-23 17:36:36 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST