167:11, INVALID, +0.5
From: Jeremy D. Selengut (selengut_at_nih.gov)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:58:14 PDT
- Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:10, INVALID, -2.0"
- In reply to: Christopher Bartlett: "167:8"
- Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Maybe reply: Christopher Bartlett: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
>All future rules must contain a genetic modification of the patented phrase
>from the previous rule. Valid genetic modifications are limited to the
>following:
>
>1. You may delete exactly one word.
>
>2. You may add exactly one word.
>
>3. You may substitute exactly one word for exactly one word in the sequence.
>
>"Only character strings that meet any these criteria" are valid genetic
>modifications.
Submitted by Kitt Bartlett
Judgement: Inconsistent with 167:8 which requires the "splicing in" of
exactly 1/2 of any patented phrase that appears in the rule
previous. 167:8 is the most recent rule.
Style: +0.5
--
Rule Date: 2001-08-21 20:59:10 GMT
- Next message: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:10, INVALID, -2.0"
- In reply to: Christopher Bartlett: "167:8"
- Next in thread: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Maybe reply: Christopher Bartlett: "Re: 167:11, INVALID, +0.5"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST