Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?

From: Jesse F. W (jessefw_at_loop.com)
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 12:25:13 PDT

• Next message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Question:
    Suppose a rule, call it rule A, was posted; then another rule, rule
B, was posted, which conflicted with rule A.  Then rule A was found
to be invalid (or unsuccesful, it does not matter).  Would rule B also
be not valid because of conflicts with rule A, or would rule B then be
valid(assuming no other problems with it)?

        Puzzling, puzzling, puzziling,
            Jesse F. Weinstein

--
Rule Date: 2001-08-20 19:28:06 GMT

• Next message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Previous message: Jeremy D. Selengut: "167:3 VALID +0.5"
• Next in thread: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Reply: Jeremy D. Selengut: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Reply: Jesse Welton: "Re: Does a rule have to obey rules posted before it, but validated after it?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST