From: Jeff Weston (Sir Toby) (jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2003 - 23:37:15 PDT
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Nathan Russell wrote: > --On Wednesday, October 01, 2003 7:16 AM +0200 "Jeff Weston (Sir > Toby)" <jjweston_at_kenny.sir-toby.com> wrote: > > > While I originally considered whether or not a dedicated Nathan > > Russell with an orbital mirror could take out all the root servers, > > the orbital mind control lasers have ordered me to be nice today, so > > I'll assume that all of the root servers in all of their respective > > secret locations could not be destroyed. Rule is VALID. > > I do wonder whether it's correct, though. > > http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=%22ro> ot+domain+server%22+%22secret+location%22&btnG=Google+Search > > returns NO results. There are variants of that query that return some results. Take this query: "root server" "physical location" secret It returns "about 87" hits, and a few of them do imply that the locations of the servers are indeed secret. In any case, the Verisign as described by 216:07 describes the location as secret. I'm inclined to let the judgement stand. There is always the option of an overrule proposal. -- Jeff Weston (Sir Toby)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST