209:3

From: Ed Murphy (emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 20:03:29 PDT


 > Sarcasm is the lowest form of humour. But then maybe, just maybe you
 > have managed to break that spell with your brilliantly sarcastic first
 > rule. However, I fear that others will be unable to match your brilliant
 > "wit" in using what you have shown to be a formidable tool of
 > communication. So what to do? I really do believe that others will be
 > able to learn the mysteries of this quirky piece of language only by
 > picking apart its previous usage. As such all future rules shall make
 > comment on the sarcasm in previous rules.

Oh yeah, that was well-written.  Did you pick out the crayon yourself?

All future rules shall include a quotation of the last rule (valid or not),
so as to better make fun of it.

Furthermore, no rule shall prohibit or restrict /ad hominem/ comments.  What
fun would it be if we did that?

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-05-22 03:30:14 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST