Re: 196:7 INVALID +3.0

From: Tieka (cmhuston_at_mts.net)
Date: Thu Nov 14 2002 - 10:52:14 PST


>
> Okay, I'm confused. It appears that others are confused as well.
>
> Neither 196:3 or 196:4 deciphered the F'rcyeh Tablets, yet they were
> declared Valid. Your judgement for 196:4 even brough up the point, but
> declared it valid anyways.
>
> I think I will make a couple of proposals to decide the ambiguities I'm
> seeing here.

The ordinances allow me 3 days to make a ruling on a proposal. Since the
consideration time for 196:3 and 196:4 had already expired, I am unable to
change my rulings thus they remain valid. The only recourse at this point is
in making proposals and getting the needed votes.

Tieka

--
Rule Date: 2002-11-14 19:53:46 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST