RE: rule 231:4 (VALID, +2.9 style)

From: Ed Murphy (
Date: Tue Jan 25 2005 - 20:12:26 PST

On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 12:37, Jonathan Van Matre wrote:

> Dear bd,
> Dear David L Nicol,
> Dear Bert Sevenhant,
> Dear Brian Donlan,
> and other esteemed members of the FRC,
> I am of degree Q, which is both greater and lesser than all other degrees.
> Thanks to our intriguing choice of a non-linear numeric system for the degrees, I cannot be certain whether Bert's recent transition from degree 1 to degree 2 could be construed as an "upgrade", but let me congratulate Bert anyway on the felicitous event.  Well done!
> All subsequent posters should identify how their own degree relates in numeric comparison to at least one other degree.
> -Jonathan (deg. Q, whose superpower is Distracting Archvillains By Getting Bad 80's Songs Stuck In Their Head)

No problems.  VALID, +2.9 style.

+1.0 Follows theme
+1.0 Non-linear 'higher' relation
+0.5 Follows own restriction on future rules
+0.5 Specifies superpower
-0.1 HTML

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST