Re: 228:A

From: Nick Neisler (nen_at_rhythm.com)
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 13:46:20 PST

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Previous message: frc_at_chuckcarroll.org: "228:A"
• In reply to: frc_at_chuckcarroll.org: "228:A"
• Next in thread: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Reply: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

frc_at_chuckcarroll.org wrote:

>
>----------
>
>Proposal 228:A (Overrule)
>
>Ed Murphy shall be Judge for round 228.
>
>----------
>

I also vote YES.

• Next message: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Previous message: frc_at_chuckcarroll.org: "228:A"
• In reply to: frc_at_chuckcarroll.org: "228:A"
• Next in thread: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Reply: David Nicol: "Re: 228:A"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST