From: jcm3_at_cec.wustl.edu
Date: Wed May 19 2004 - 12:07:30 PDT
wrt. "224:3 Gatsby" VALID -1 It should be obvious that "224:3 Gatsby" has the word "address" in its header. The way that David does not state this fact makes it clear to me that he is claiming ignorance (albeit implicitly) of a previous rule. No one else has acted to "point out" anything. This is therefore VALID, and extends the play time for Arnt. Also, as a technical point, I will only judge the contents and not the header of rule posts as part of a rule. Style: -0.5 Not on theme -0.5 Does not introduce a new rule. > Quoting david nicol: >> Shall not occur within this round again that glyph >> twixt d and f. > > I reluctantly point out that David Nicol's 224:3 contains > that glyph in > its "from" addr... addr... uh... > > Arnt >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST