Re: 225 Summary 1

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (arnt_at_oryx.com)
Date: Tue Jun 22 2004 - 05:08:42 PDT

• Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 225 Summary 1"
• Previous message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "225 Summary 1"
• In reply to: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "225 Summary 1"
• Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 225 Summary 1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Arnt Gulbrandsen, universally esteemed novice Judge, writes:
> (I think that should be it, right?)

Oh, I should have noted that both rules were valid. Well, they were.

Arnt

• Next message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 225 Summary 1"
• Previous message: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "225 Summary 1"
• In reply to: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "225 Summary 1"
• Next in thread: Arnt Gulbrandsen: "Re: 225 Summary 1"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST