Re: anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)

From: david nicol (whatever_at_davidnicol.com)
Date: Sun Feb 08 2004 - 18:51:30 PST

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2) VALID, -3.0"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Mornington Crescent!

• Next message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2) VALID, -3.0"
• Previous message: Ed Murphy: "anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• In reply to: Ed Murphy: "anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• Next in thread: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: anecdote 221:z (1 of 2) (2 of 2)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST