Re: 230:5 invalid

From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 23 2004 - 13:44:04 PST

• Next message: David Nicol: "230 ANARCHY NOW summary to date"
• Previous message: David Nicol: "Re: 230:4 valid"
• In reply to: Bryan Donlan: "230:5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

fails to explicitly denounce the theme.   Invalid.

fails to conform to the "further the paranoia" restriction implied in :4.

As much as the judge agrees with the rational process operating here,
"Getting to yes" was several rounds ago.

one style point.


On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 04:09:07 +0100 (CET), Bryan Donlan
<bdonlan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> 230:5
> -------------------------
> Okay, I can understand the complaints of you anarchists - you're
> afraid we'll abuse our power and oppress you, right? I have a solution
> for you: From now on all fantasy rules will set restrictions in place.
> That should satisfy everyone, right?
> -------------------------
> --
> bd
> 
> 


-- 
David L Nicol
Holiday reminder: chocolate is poisonous to dogs.

• Next message: David Nicol: "230 ANARCHY NOW summary to date"
• Previous message: David Nicol: "Re: 230:4 valid"
• In reply to: Bryan Donlan: "230:5"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST