Re: 230:3 invalid

From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 22 2004 - 14:07:13 PST


As much as the judge enjoys being called "unerringly wise" this proposed FR
is not conformant to the valid 230:2 which requires 230 FRs to "denounce" the
theme, not praise it.  Try again.

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 22:03:55 +0100 (CET), Bor Onx <boronx_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> 230:3 --
> In light of the liberating, insightful theme suggest
> by our unerringly wise judge, how can any one person
> hold dominion over another?  Indeed, the very idea
> that someone's arbitrarily imposed rules can restrict
> the rest of us is abhorrent.
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
> 
> 


-- 
David L Nicol
Holiday reminder: chocolate is poisonous to dogs.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST