Re: frc: proposal

From: David Nicol (davidnicol_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 18 2004 - 22:09:14 PST

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Previous message: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• In reply to: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

what would this mean? I don't see a difference.


On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 19:52:18 +0100 (CET), Bor Onx <boronx_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> Thank you for the pointer
> 
> I'd like to announce my intention to join the FRC with
> a proposal to replace RO 6 (but not 6a and 6b) with
> the following for the length of this round:
> 
> 6.  Judge.  The Judge is responsible for interpreting
> the ordinances and determining the validity of fantasy
> rules. If a fantasy rule is consistent with itself,
> previously posted valid fantasy rules, or the regular
> ordinances, then the Judge shall declare that rule
> invalid or unsuccesful, otherwise e shall declare it valid.
> 
> 
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
> http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
> 
> 


-- 
David L Nicol
Holiday reminder: chocolate is poisonous to dogs.

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Previous message: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• In reply to: Bor Onx: "frc: proposal"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: frc: proposal"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST