Re: 216:10

From: Arnt Gulbrandsen (
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 03:04:09 PDT

Arnt Gulbrandsen writes:
> One really must hope that the Judge will make a fair-minded, neatly 
> elaborated decision. However, based on evidence of past rounds, the 
> Judge is more likely to be a corrupted by the posters of rules 
> 216:08, 216:09 or *nudge nudge wink wink* 216:10.


That's what I get for writing in a hurry.

But I'll argue that it's OK: If the Judge makes neatly elaborated 
decisions, surely that shows that the Judge himself is neat.


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST