Re: 208:3 VALID +2.0

From: Richard S. Holmes (rsholmes_at_MailBox.Syr.Edu)
Date: Wed May 21 2003 - 12:25:59 PDT

• Next message: Alan Riddell: "Round 209:Rule 2"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Round 209:Rule 1 -- VALID, +2.0"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Murphy: "208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: 208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: 208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Ed Murphy <emurphy42_at_socal.rr.com> writes:

> >I see a potential paradox here.  +1.0 Style to the first player who
> >identifies the one I have in mind.
> 
> Alan Riddell identified it.  I hereby increase the Style of 208:4
> from +0.0 to +1.0

So what was the potential paradox?

-- 
- Rich Holmes
  Syracuse, NY
                  "We're waist deep in the Big Muddy
                   And the big fool says to push on." -- Pete Seeger

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-05-21 19:26:15 GMT

• Next message: Alan Riddell: "Round 209:Rule 2"
• Previous message: Richard S. Holmes: "Re: Round 209:Rule 1 -- VALID, +2.0"
• Maybe in reply to: Ed Murphy: "208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Next in thread: Ed Murphy: "Re: 208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Reply: Ed Murphy: "Re: 208:3 VALID +2.0"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST