question about 205:A & 205:1

From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:35:59 PST

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "205:6"
• Previous message: Steve Gardner: "205:5 (was 205:3) INVALID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

205:A proposes to override RO6 for the duration of Round 205.

If it passes, 205:1 will retrospectively have been VALID. So if 205:A
passes, should I change my judgement, assuming that I can?

Steve



-- 


Steve Gardner                   | 
School of Computer Science      |      I've only just realized
 and Software Engineering       |      how self-conscious I am.
gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au   | 

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-21 03:36:24 GMT

• Next message: Ed Murphy: "205:6"
• Previous message: Steve Gardner: "205:5 (was 205:3) INVALID"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST