Re: 205:A

From: nrussell_at_acsu.buffalo.edu
Date: Wed Mar 19 2003 - 18:41:15 PST


--On Thursday, March 20, 2003 1:13 PM +1100 Steve Gardner 
<gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au> wrote:

> Round 205: PROPOSAL A
>
> For the duration of Round 205, Regular Ordinance 6 is amended to read:
>
>     6. Judge.  The Judge is responsible for interpreting the ordinances
>        and determining the validity of fantasy rules. If a fantasy rule
>        is inconsistent with itself, or the regular ordinances, then the
>        Judge shall declare that rule invalid or unsuccessful. If a
>        fantasy rule is inconsistent with a previously posted fantasy rule
>        or rules, then the Judge shall declare the rule to be valid if
>        and only if it has higher precedence than the rule or rules with
>        which it is in conflict, according to the rules for determining
>        precedence then in force.

FOR

Nathan

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-20 02:41:33 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST