Re: 204:10 VALID +1.5

From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Tue Mar 18 2003 - 18:25:37 PST


On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Ed Murphy wrote:

> Joshua <j3b4_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Steve: "Ah replace 'em by the new ones."
> > Who: "Although, be yet mindful prior rule?"
> >      : "                !"
> > Stev: "Soon we'll lack rule spaces." 
> > [unfill some]
> > [reword some]
> > 
> > Rival dialog begins:
> > Lopez:"                                "
> > Carlos:"Heh, heh. Small chance of that."
> 
> VALID.  I'm okay with a rule using a new form of change, so long as it
> explicitly requires or allows that form of change.

Can you confirm that the Rules was submitted within the available time?
It looked to be 2-3 hours late to me...

Steve (who would rather like to be a Judge sometime...)


-- 


Steve Gardner                   | 
School of Computer Science      |      I've only just realized
 and Software Engineering       |      how self-conscious I am.
gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au   | 

-- 
Rule Date: 2003-03-19 02:25:56 GMT


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST