From: Steve Gardner (gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au)
Date: Mon Jun 30 2003 - 22:00:38 PDT
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Alan Riddell wrote:
> 211.02
> ====
>
> This is a Rule.
>
> ====
Judgement: INVALID
The restriction of Rule 211:1 reads:
Their rules must be dirty and underhanded, and though valid due to
nominal adherence to the regular ordinances and consistency with
previous rules, they all violate the spirit of those ordinances in
one way or another.
I agree that this Rule adheres only nominally to the regular ordinances
while violating their spirit. However I see nothing dirty or underhanded
about the tactics employed here.
Style:
+ 0.5 for nominal adherence to Rules while violating their spirit
- 0.5 for vacuity
=====
0.0 TOTAL
--
Steve Gardner |
School of Computer Science | I've only just realized
and Software Engineering | how self-conscious I am.
gardner_at_sng.its.monash.edu.au |
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 24 2011 - 10:48 PST